1420 Fifth Avenue Suite 3700, Seattle, WA USA 98101
Melissa Harwood is a registered patent attorney who focuses her practice on strategic intellectual property counseling, IP portfolio development and management, patent prosecution, and IP due diligence for a variety of transactions including venture financings, public offerings, and other deals.
Melissa’s client base is centered around the biotechnology, therapeutics, and chemical industries and includes both early stage and established companies. Melissa counsels her clients in connection with IP transactions and agreements including license agreements, collaboration agreements, and merger and acquisition agreements. She also has experience in patent litigation and dispute resolution including proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).
Prior to joining the firm, Melissa was a partner in the Seattle, Washington office of an international law firm where she focused her practice on strategic intellectual property counseling as well as patent due diligence for partnering deals, venture financings, public offerings, and mergers & acquisitions.
Prior to launching her legal career, Melissa worked as a synthetic bench chemist for a life sciences company and as a postdoctoral research scientist in the Department of Chemistry at the University of Washington.
Melissa has been a frequent presenter, speaker, lecturer, panelist, moderator, program developer, and creator for several years at events including Life Science Washington, Practising Law Institute (PLI), Innovator's Edge, University of Washington Foster School of Business, and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center.
Melissa was recommended by Legal 500 US in 2023 for Patent Prosecution (including re-examination and post-grant proceedings). She was also recognized for Biotechnology and Life Sciences Practice and Patent Law in 2022 by The Best Lawyers in America®.
Experience
*Represented therapeutics company in obtaining more than $200 million in financing.
*Represented underwriters in IP due diligence for a biotechnology company's $80 million IPO.
*Represented underwriters in IP due diligence for a biotechnology company's $200 million, $144 million, $160 million, and $250 million offerings.
*Represented underwriters in IP due diligence for a biotechnology company's $73 million IPO.
*Represented investors in IP due diligence for a biotechnology company's $270 million Series A round of financing.
*Represented investors in IP due diligence for a biotechnology company's $55 million Series B round of financing.
*Represented biotechnology company in a $33 million Series A round of financing.
*Represented biotechnology company in a $55 million financing.
*Represented biotechnology company in a $177 million IPO.
*Experience gained by attorney prior to joining Kilpatrick
Asset Creation - Prosecution & Counseling
Licensing, Transactions & Monetization
University of Washington School of Law J.D. (2009)
University of Washington Ph.D., Chemistry (2006)
University of Utah B.S., Chemistry (2001)
Washington (2009)
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2007)
JDRF Greater Northwest, Board Member and Executive Committee Member (2017-Present)
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
